Check prices now:
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 – http://amzn.to/2u3yg3X
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 – http://amzn.to/2t9Zanz
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 – http://amzn.to/2t9DMyT
Intel Core i7-8700K – http://amzn.to/2ypVzZ2
Intel Core i5-8600K – http://amzn.to/2yqkATZ
Intel Core i5-8400 – http://amzn.to/2fSvv16
Intel Z370 Motherboards – http://amzn.to/2hNiMxg
AMD B350 Motherboards – http://amzn.to/2u3kJtc
AMD X370 Motherboards – http://amzn.to/2u2D5ZE
Read the written version of this article on TechSpot:
https://www.techspot.com/article/1532-pubg-cpu-benchmarks/
Support us on Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxed
PUBG CPU Benchmark, Dec 2017 Updated Results [16 CPUs Tested]
FOLLOW ME IN THESE PLACES FOR UPDATES
Twitter – http://twitter.com/hardwareunboxed
Facebook – http://facebook.com/hardwareunboxed
Google Plus – http://goo.gl/xx14Uj
Instagram – https://goo.gl/8lhprr
Music By: https://soundcloud.com/lakeyinspired
Amazon Auto Links: No products found.
![PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds [PUBG 1.0] CPU Benchmark, Ryzen vs. Coffee Lake](https://img.youtube.com/vi/sOvwrGx5uas/0.jpg "PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds [PUBG 1.0] CPU Benchmark, Ryzen vs. Coffee Lake")
![RTX 2060 Review – The GPU to Buy in 2019?! [1440P & 4K Gaming TESTED!]](https://img.youtube.com/vi/kCnnHFoOruQ/0.jpg "RTX 2060 Review – The GPU to Buy in 2019?! [1440P & 4K Gaming TESTED!]")
It’s annoying people people like games that are unoptimized trash :/
What software that you use to show that min, avg, and max fps?
Can you make an Arma 3 CPU Benchmark?
Steve = Dedicated to quality uploads. How long till you can get the minions (kids) to make all these passes for you. Great work as always mate
The “risk” is of course that Zen+ will do pretty great.
Increase at-least 10% of those frame-rates and you catch up about half the difference. So not Intel performance … but then check CPU utilization and it will drop even further.
Actually it’s kinda weird with 45% = almost three cores on i7 vs 25% = just two cores on Ryzen 7 if all work was pushed onto the same core.
Make you wonder if the Intel measurement somehow take into account that the HT thread will perform worse whereas the Ryzen measurement assume they both can run at the same speed / utilize full speed even though the other one is used too.
I wonder how it measure CPU utilization for the whole processor in general. What give those numbers? Are AMD tricking the software here?
Two words: BENCHMARK KING!
Can you please do the same test on other resolutions including ultrawide? Cheers!
To be fair in a lot of games especially indie, SMT doesn’t seem to be coded for fully, so probably a hinderance for a lot of indies. Perhaps when testing the 1600 or 1700 you can do 2 sets of results. SMT on and off for future benchmarks for the time being? Would be insightful with these newer games especially fortnite and pubg etc. plus it will also settle regularly once and for all whether it is game devs not coding for SMT seperatly thats the problem. Plus steve.. you love benchmarking 😉
I really appreciate your work, but the game will recive a big patch in december. This video is a bit late i think.
God damn Steve, give yourself a break man, or at least, boost yourself up with some RedBulls to keep more PUBG benchmarks coming, lol
Outstanding work as always 😀
I hate the fact that I love this unoptimized trashy game
Hi, question, whats the 1℅ min fps? I saw a test here were the average fps is 111 but the 1% isat 98, surely 98 is not the 1℅??
More proof that Ryzen just cannot keep up in gaming. All the guys claiming they can just upgrade at Zen 2, sure you can at a cost. Also selling those first gen Ryzen CPUs which are known to be shit OC and worse in gaming won’t be easy with the new toys out.
Love the cheapo green LED fan inside the high end case! Ace.
Hay Steve. Do I get bonus points for spotting the old school socket 7 pentium chip added to your shelf? It’s right there beside the Ryzen retail shipping container. It’s also new. I’ve never seen it in any of your videos before this one.
It was nice to compare with AMD graphics card, I think nVIDIA hurts Ryzen performance!
(edit) i used play claw 6 to see mine, it tops at 67% but doesn’t stay there, its all over the place high 30’s-50’s i’m using FX-8350 at 4.5GHz 16GB DDr 3 2133 RX 570 4 GB. at all medium the gpu is peg’d at 100% using at most 3.7GB of 4. 1400MHz with 1850MHz memory. fps range high 30’s to 60’s hovering in the high 40’s to 50’s foliage and draw distance was on ultra
Do you guys want to see the same CPU benchmark for Fortnite?
I have friend who plays it on i7 2700k. Hes getting drops to 50fps often, on plane it was like 30 i think. So it looks like to me that it runs bad on old intels too.
#g4560Squad
The whole game is a serious optimization issue
Pochinki for the boys
im hoping im only having issues with the game because im using an r9 390 and because ive got my R5 1600 at 3.8ghz with my 3200mhz kit only running at 2666mhz
you’ve got vega 64lc edition. so lets benchmark cpu with 64 lc. i want to see how ryzen and vega work together?
This is interesting. I get quite different results. 7600k with a 1080ti gets me around 90-140 FPS in Pochinki (same area as you tested) but for me the only bottleneck is the CPU and also RAM. I get 90-100 CPU usage and less than 50% GPU usage at all times. When I had 8GB of ram my FPS were about 20-30 lower on average with annoying stutters sometimes especially while driving. Now running 16gb of ram at 2133 is a lot smoother despite lower speed. Would be interesting to see whether a higher ram speed would make much of a difference and I’ll also be looking at OCing my CPU as those two seem to be the bottleneck for me, not the GPU.
A 1440p version of this video would be great for those with a bit better cash flow.
I believe that for the game to be optimized, they have to rework the whole game engine, basically starting from zero. I doubt that any patches in the future will make major performance differences. I hope im wrong.
@ 6:45 you said the R5 1600X has 4 cores and 8 threads by mistake btw. Shocking game optimisation though still.
Very timely review, Iv’e been considering an x5690 overclocked to get better results from pubg as multiple threads is supposedly supported….But we have seen a lot of claims from Bluehole with their farcical optimisation updates and its nice to see channels calling out the BS being fed to the public. I have an old i7 @ 4ghz and a gtx970 and neither are ever being utilised more that 50% during game play….The latest test servers show a 10 to 15 fps improvement for me which is nice but also to little to late given version 1.0 is due for release in less than a month.
Bluehole need to pull their finger out of their Brownhole!
Are those ryzen cpus running at stock speeds?
Its like Bulldozer Benchmark when they release
Unexpected performance of the i3-8350k cpu. Thanks for all the hard work!
PUBG with that 3rd person mode is such bullshit
thats all well and good but not everyone has a 1080Ti
Can you test at Very Low 720p with the 1080 Ti? I know no one would play like that, just curious to see what happens when the GPU bottleneck is removed.
Love it!
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/ppgKyf
1440p160 gsync 2000$
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/wJfRLD
4k60 950$
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/qj4wTH
1080p60 800$
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/TjYwTH
768p60 400$
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/qXPhRG
1440p144 hdr free sync 2000$
Why is the ryzen 1500X not performing near as good as the 7700k? When they’re like near the same power.
Is that an Asrock x299 itx board in the background? That’s pretty cool. Hope to see a video on it sometime soon.
Amazingly poorly optimised game. And then say you take advantage of high core counts… wow. What about the 1950X? I would guess less than 10% utilisation:p
So they did a gpu benchmark already? Or are they doing one
Keep up the great work. I have been looking for a video like this!